A public record of constitutional questions
Read the filings, milestones, and questions behind two personal matters pursued without an attorney. This archive is offered for transparency and education, not legal advice or representation.
Disclaimer: These cases are pursued by Joshua M. Abrams as an individual, pro se litigant. He is not an attorney. These cases are NOT pursued as Just Liberty Incorporated or in any capacity as its founder.
Abrams v. Isolda — U.S. Supreme Court Docket No. 25-6394
Challenging Absolute Immunity & Restoring Due Process
This petition asked the U.S. Supreme Court whether the Constitution permits a judicial system to operate with total impunity. It challenged the unconstitutional evolution of "Absolute Immunity" — a judge-made doctrine that has devolved from protecting the act of judging into a weapon shielding bad-faith misconduct, retaliation, and the denial of due process.
While the Court ultimately declined to grant review, the petition remains a public record of the questions presented and the path taken through the state courts. The docket, filings, and outcome are presented here so readers can inspect the source material for themselves.
Case Trajectory
Questions Presented for Review
The "Remedy Gap"
Challenging immunity doctrines that shield judges acting in clear absence of jurisdiction.
The Right to a Jury
Whether punitive sanctions imposed by a judge alone require a jury under the Seventh Amendment.
The "Pay-to-Play" Barrier
Exposing mandatory costs that function as a modern poll tax on indigent litigants.
Due Process for Pro Se
Whether ignoring mandatory rules to punish the poor is a per se Due Process violation.
Community Acknowledgement
A special thank you to Anythink Libraries for their invaluable logistical support in preparing the physical filings. We thank all Libraries for their commitment to community support.
Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance
Colorado Federal Court • Case No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR
A federal lawsuit describing alleged failures in Colorado's unemployment insurance system, including delays and "integrity holds." The filings are available below for readers to review.
Systemic Impact
The complaint describes alleged failures affecting claimants in Colorado. This archive does not make a finding on disputed facts.
Key Legal Allegations
Case Impact
Hundreds of thousands of unemployment claimants across Colorado
Systemic reform of unemployment insurance processes nationwide
Due Process, First Amendment, ADA, and Privacy protections
Case Documents
Timeline
Second Amended Complaint Filed
September 21, 2025
Emergency Injunction Proceedings
Ongoing
Motion to Amend Response
Pending
Court Ruling Expected
TBD
Community Discussion
Support Justice Reform
These cases represent a fight for constitutional rights, accessible justice, and systemic reform. Your support helps ensure justice is accessible to everyone.